Problem Statment

Design a cart that is safe, resilient, low-cost, low-weight, and user-friendly. The cart will be resilient by being strong and durable that can perform in multiple environments, extreme temperatures, absorbs impact and safely clears the ground. It will be user friendly by having free spinning wheels and will have a safe and efficient way to slow down and stop the cart. It will be light weight enough to be easily lifted, transported and collapsible. It will be safe enough for the riders, the dogs, and the bystanders. It will be single operant and be able to hold 2 average-weight people while being able to travel at speeds up to 30 mph.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Suspension

The current focus of the team at this moment is the suspension. The importance of the suspension is high, the team must establish a design that allow the user of the mushing cart to maneuver the vehicle safely from a rear position while all the pivoting wheels are located on the front of the cart.

After searching for ideas, the team was able to find an off-road handcycle used for extreme sports by the handicap.

Inspired by the design, the team hope to use this for their mushing cart with steering being possible from a rear position. 

Solid modeling has begun on the suspension system, and the team hopes to have those completed in the near future.

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Decision Making


Over the Spring break, the team met to make further decisions on the urban mushing cart. The following are possible options that we have narrowed down for the use of our chassis.
  • Square vs. Round Tubing
    • Thickness of material
  • 4130 Alloy Steel (Chromoly) vs. 606-T6 Aluminum
Pros:
  • Easier to weld

Cons:
  • Load concentration areas

Pros:
  • Cheap
  • Widely Available

Cons:
  • Harder to weld/bend
Future tasks

  • Budget
    • The team also spoke about funding for the cost of the material. The budget is currently $1000, but in the case that budget will be exceeded the team has determine that fundraising will be a necessity. The team has contacted fundraising coordinators at Warner Brothers Studios to attend TV show tapings in the event that more funds are needed.
  • CAD
    • A few things that the team will be working on in the following weeks is create rough CAD designs in order to get an idea of what materials will be more advantages. This task will also assist in determining what material and shape we should use when our CAD designs undergo static analysis. 


Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Finalizing the Design

The team set limits for components in order to prepare for narrowing the options of components in an attempt to finalize the design. Below is what the team established:


=


where,

  1. Tires
  2. Length of frame
  3. Double barrel lever disk brakes
  4. Height of frame
  5. Steering
  6. Suspension 
  7. Digger brake
  8. Hitch
The Decisions that were made were made the week of the (3/18/13) were:
  • Tires
    • Buy
    • Size: 12-16 inches (in diameter)
  • Frame (length & height)
    • Build frame
    • 6ft. x 3.5ft. x 3ft.(L x W x H) in approximation
  • Brakes
    • Buy
    • Double barrel lever (disk brakes)
    • On all four wheels
  • Steering
    • Make handlebars
    • Buy handlebar grips
    • Front steering
  • Suspension
    • Buying
    • Front suspension
  • Digger Brake
    • Make
  • Hitch
    • Make
    • Hook to carabiner
To be determine in the Following weeks:
With certain areas of the design still in a grey area, the team will work together to fully complete the design by establishing how the suspension will work together with the steering. The steering will also be looking into, currently the idea is to create a four-bar linkage that connect from the back to the front, in order to steer from the back. Finally the team will also finalize whether the cart will have both front and back suspension or just front suspension.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Urban Mushing Cart Visits The Team


The team gathered on campus to examine the client's own mushing cart to gather information and ideas on how to improve on their design.




Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Google Drive

https://drive.google.com/?tab=mo&authuser=0#my-drive

PDS

Attribute Type Metric/Requirement Unit Notes
Safe  Objective # of ways to cause bodily harm    
Resilliance Objective Varying impact and Temp. Force/Temp.  
Low-Cost Objective less than $1000 Dollars  
Low-Weight Objective  less then 85lb Pounds  
User Friendly Objective Ease of transport    
Regulate Speed Function Accelerate as fast as dogs/80% efficiency    
Regualte Direction Function Change alignment within 5 secods Time  
Decrease Speed Function Decelerate from 30-0MPH MPH  
    Stopping must range from 50-100ft Feet  
Stabalize Driver Function Reaction force must be less than 2/3 of impact force lbf  
Secure Passenger Function Hold lateral force of 500lbf  lbf  
Attach Dogs Function Sustain tensile forces of 250lbf/dog lbf  
Transfer Energy Function Transer Kinetic Energy of at least 25%    
Absorb Impact Function absorb 60lbf of impact lbf  
Prevent Damage Function Components must hold 60% of yield strength